MINIMUM FLOWS AND LEVELS

Part I: General

40E-8.011            Purpose and General Provisions

40E-8.021            Definitions

Part II: MFL Criteria for Lower East Coast Regional Planning Area

40E-8.221            Minimum Flows and Levels: Surface Waters

40E-8.231            Minimum Levels: Aquifers 

Part III: MFL Criteria for Lower West Coast Regional Planning Area

40E-8.321            Minimum Flows and Levels: Surface Waters

40E-8.331            Minimum Levels: Aquifers

Part IV: Implementation

40E-8.421            Prevention and Recovery Strategies

40E-8.431            Consumptive Use Permitting

40E-8.441            Water Shortage Plan Implementation

PART I:   GENERAL

40E-8.011 Purpose and General Provisions.

(1)       The purpose of this Chapter is:

(a)       To establish minimum flows for specific surface watercourses and minimum water levels for specific surface waters and specific aquifers within the South Florida Water Management District, pursuant to Section 373.042, F.S.; and;

(b)       To establish the rule framework for implementation of recovery and prevention strategies, developed pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S.

(2)       Minimum flows are established to identify where further withdrawals would cause significant harm to the water resources, or to the ecology of the area.  Minimum levels are established to identify where further withdrawals would cause significant harm to the water resources of the area.  Specific minimum flows and levels (MFLs) are established in this rule for specified priority water bodies that have been designated pursuant to Section 373.042(2) F.S.

(3)       The MFL's established herein are based on existing best available information, and will be periodically reviewed, at least every five years, based on new information and changing water resource conditions.   Revisions to established MFLs will be peer reviewed as required by Section 373.042, F.S., prior to rule adoption.    The minimum flow criteria for the Caloosahatchee River in Rule 40E-8.221(2), F.A.C., shall be reviewed within one year of the effective date of this rule (September 10, 2001) and amended, as necessary, based on best available information.

(4)       The recovery and prevention strategies set forth in Rule 40E-8.421, F.A.C.,  the consumptive use permitting procedures described in Paragraph Rules 40E-2.301(1)(i), Rule 40E-8.431, F.A.C., and Section 3.9 of the “Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District – September 2001,” and the water shortage plan implementation provisions specified in Rules 40E-8.441, 40E-21.531, and 40E-21.541, and Part III of Chapter 40E-22, F.A.C., are inseparable components of the minimum flows and levels established in Rules 40E-8.321 and 40E-8.331, F.A.C. The District would not have adopted the minimum flows and levels set forth in Rules 40E-8.321 and 40E-8.331, F.A.C. for Lake Okeechobee, the Everglades, the Biscayne Aquifer, the Lower West Coast Aquifers, and the Caloosahatchee River without simultaneously adopting their related implementation rules.  If the rules cited above, as they pertain to a specified MFL water body, are found to be invalid, in whole or in part, such specified minimum flow(s) or level(s) in Rule 40E-8.321 or 40E-8.331, F.A.C., (including Lake Okeechobee, Everglades, Biscayne Aquifer, Lower West Coast Aquifers, Caloosahatchee River) shall not be adopted, or if already in effect, shall not continue to be applied, until the District amends the applicable regional water supply plan(s), as necessary, and amends the subject rules, as necessary to address the reason for invalidity consistent with the requirements of Section 373.0421, F.S.  This section shall be triggered after a rule is found to be invalid pursuant to a final order issued under Section 120.56, F.S., and after appellate review remedies have been exhausted.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421 FS.

History - New  9-10-01.


40E-8.021 Definitions.

The terms set forth herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, and such meanings shall apply throughout the rules contained in this Chapter. The terms defined in Rule 40E-8.021, F.A.C., shall apply throughout the District’s consumptive use permit rules. In the event of a conflict or difference between the definitions contained in Rule 40E-8.021, F.A.C., and the definitions set forth in other District rules, the definitions in this Rule 40E-8.021, F.A.C., shall control for purposes of this chapter.

(1)       Biscayne Aquifer – means the highly permeable surficial strata (hydraulic conductivities generally greater than 500 ft/day) that occur within Monroe, Miami-Dade (excluding those portions of coastal Monroe and Miami-Dade counties that discharge groundwater into Florida and Biscayne Bays), eastern Broward, and portions of eastern Palm Beach counties.

(2)       Caloosahatchee River – means the surface waters that flow  through the S-79 structure, combined with tributary contributions below S-79 that collectively flow southwest to San Carlos Bay.

(3)       C&SF Project –  means the project for Central and Southern Florida authorized under the heading 'CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA' in section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (Chapter 771).

(4)       CERP – means the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan contained in the 'Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement', dated April 1, 1999, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 2000.

(5)       Certification or Certify – means the formal determination by the District, through a validation process consistent with state and federal law, of the total amount of water made available by a project or project phase of a recovery or prevention strategy, as appropriate, for natural systems and other uses.

(6)       Direct Withdrawal means: 

(a)       A ground water withdrawal that causes a water table drawdown greater than 0.1 feet, as determined using a model accepted by the District, at any location beneath the MFL surface water body or aquifer, up through a 1 in 10 year drought; or

(b)       A surface water withdrawal from facilities physically located within the boundaries of a MFL surface water body.

(7)       Everglades – means the lands and waters included within Water Conservation Areas, the Holeyland/Rotenberger wildlife management areas, and the freshwater portions of the Everglades National Park.

(8)       Harm – means the temporary loss of water resource functions, as defined for consumptive use permitting in Chapter 40E-2, F.A.C., that results from a change in surface or ground water hydrology and takes a period of one to two years of average rainfall conditions to recover.

(9)       Indirect Withdrawal – means the withdrawal of water from a water source for a consumptive use that receives surface water or ground water from a MFL water body or is tributary to a MFL water body.

(10)     Lake Okeechobee – means the lands and waters contained within the perimeter of the Hoover Dike.

(11)     LEC Plan – means the Lower East Coast Regional Water Supply Plan – May 2000, including all three volumes.

(12)     Lower West Coast Aquifers – means the lower Tamiami aquifer, sandstone aquifer and the mid-Hawthorn aquifer that occur within Charlotte, Hendry, Glades, Lee and Collier counties.

(13)     LWC Plan – means the Lower West Coast Regional Water Supply Plan – April 2000, including all three volumes.

(14)     Minimum Flow – means a flow established by the District pursuant to Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S., for a given water body and set forth in Parts II and III of this chapter, at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources or ecology of the area.

(15)     Minimum Flow and Level Exceedance – means to fall below a minimum flow or level, which is established in Parts II and III of this chapter, for a  duration greater than specified for the MFL water body.

(16)     Minimum Flow and Level Violation – means to fall below a minimum flow or minimum level, which is established in Parts II and III of this chapter, for a duration and frequency greater than specified for the MFL water body.   Unless otherwise specified herein, in determining the frequency with which water flows and levels fall below an established MFL for purposes of determining a MFL violation , a "year" means 365 days from the last day of the previous MFL exceedance.

(17)     Minimum Level – means the level of groundwater in an aquifer or the level of surface water established by the District pursuant to Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S., in Parts II and III of this chapter, at which further withdrawals would be significantly harmful to the water resources of the area.

(18)     MFL Water Body – means any surface water, watercourse, or aquifer for which an MFL is established in Part II or III of this chapter.

(19)     Operations – means activities taken by the District for the movement of surface water through works of the District pursuant to Chapter 373, F.S.

(20)     Prevention Strategy(ies) – means the structural and non-structural actions approved by the District in regional water supply plans, pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S., or by rule, for areas where MFLs are currently not violated, but are projected to be violated within twenty (20) years of the establishment of the minimum flow or level, if said prevention strategies are not implemented.

(21)     Recovery Strategy(ies) – means the structural and non-structural actions approved by the District in regional water supply plans, pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S., or by rule, for areas where MFLs are currently violated.

(22)     Regional Water Supply Plan – means a plan approved by the District pursuant to Section 373.0361, F.S.

(23)     Serious Harm – means the long-term loss of water resource functions, as addressed in Chapters 40E-21 and 40E-22, F.A.C., resulting from a change in surface or ground water hydrology.

(24)     Significant Harm – means the temporary loss of water resource functions, which result from a change in surface or ground water hydrology, that takes more than two years to recover, but which is considered less severe than serious harm.  The specific water resource functions addressed by a MFL and the duration of the recovery period associated with significant harm are defined for each priority water body based on the MFL technical support document.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421 FS.

History – New 9-10-01.

PART II:   MFL CRITERIA LOWER EAST COAST REGIONAL PLANNING AREA

40E-8.221:  Minimum Flows and Levels Surface Waters.

The MFLs contained in this Part identify the point at which further withdrawals would cause significant harm to the water resources, or ecology, of the area as applicable, pursuant to Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S.  It is the District’s intent to correct or prevent the violation of these MFLs through management of the water resources.

(1)       Lake Okeechobee.  An MFL violation occurs in Lake Okeechobee when an exceedance, as defined herein, occurs more than once every six years.  An “exceedance” is a decline below 11 feet NGVD for more than 80, non-consecutive or consecutive, days, during an eighteen month period.  The eighteen month period shall be initiated following the first day Lake Okeechobee falls below 11 feet NGVD, and shall not include more than one wet season, defined as May 31st through October 31st of any given calendar year. 

(2)       Caloosahatchee River.  A minimum mean monthly flow of 300 CFS is necessary to maintain sufficient salinities at S-79 in order to prevent a MFL exceedance.  A MFL exceedance occurs during a 365 day period, when: (a)  a 30-day average salinity concentration exceeds 10 parts per thousand at the Ft. Myers salinity station  (measured at 20% of the total river depth from the water surface at a location of latitude 263907.260, longitude 815209.296; or (b) a single, daily average salinity exceeds a concentration of 20 parts per thousand at the Ft. Myers salinity station.   Exceedance of either subsection (a) or subsection (b), for two consecutive years is a violation of the MFL.

(3)       Everglades.

          (a)       Criteria for Peat-Forming Wetlands.  Water levels within wetlands overlying organic peat soils within the water conservation areas, Rotenberger and Holeyland wildlife management areas, and Shark River Slough (Everglades National Park) shall not fall 1.0 feet or more below ground surface, as measured at a key gage, for one or more days during a period in which the water level has remained below ground for a minimum of 30 days, at specific return frequencies as specified in Table 1, below.

            (b)       Criteria for Marl-Forming Wetlands.  Water levels within marl-forming wetlands that are located east and west of Shark River Slough, the Rocky Glades, and Taylor Slough within Everglades National Park, shall not fall 1.5 feet below ground surface, as measured at a key gage, for one or more days during a period in which the water level has remained below ground for a minimum of 90 days, at specific return frequencies for different areas, as identified in Table 1, below.

The MFL criteria listed in Table 1 are based on existing changes and structural alterations to the pre-drainage conditions of the Everglades.   It is the District’s intent through implementation of the LEC Plan and the CERP to achieve minimum hydropattern return frequencies that approximate CERP compatible pre-drainage conditions in the Everglades.  As a result, as the existing structural changes and alterations are corrected, the MFL criteria contained herein will be modified through a rule amendment consistent with the LEC Plan and the CERP.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421 FS.

History – New 9-10-01.


Table 1. Minimum water levels, duration and return frequencies for key

               water management gages located within the Everglades (1,2, 3)

 

 

Area

 

 

Key Gage

Soil Type & MFL Criteria

Return Frequency (years) (3)-(4)

WCA-1

1-7

Peat(1)

1 in 4

WCA-2A

2A-17

Peat

1 in 4

WCA-2B

2B-21

Peat

1 in 3

WCA-3A North

3A-NE

Peat

1 in 2

WCA-3A North

3A-NW

Peat

1 in 4

WCA-3A North

3A-2

Peat

1 in 4

WCA-3A North

3A-3

Peat

1 in 3

WCA-3A central

3A-4

Peat

1 in 4

WCA-3A South

3A-28

Peat

1 in 4

WCA-3B

3B-SE

Peat

1 in 7

Rotenberger WMA

Rotts

Peat

1 in 2

Holeyland WMA

HoleyG

Peat

1 in 3

NE Shark Slough

NESRS-2

Peat

1 in 10

Central Shark Slough

NP-33

Peat

1 in 10

Central Shark Slough

NP 36

Peat

1 in 7

Marl wetlands east of Shark Slough

NP-38

Marl (2)

1 in 3

Marl wetlands west of Shark Slough

NP-201
G-620

Marl

1 in 5

Rockland marl marsh

G-1502

Marl

1 in 2

Taylor Slough

NP-67

Marl

1 in 2

(1) = MFL Criteria for Peat-forming wetlands: Water levels within wetlands overlying organic peat soils within the water conservation areas, Rotenberger and Holeyland wildlife management areas, and Shark River Slough (Everglades National Park) shall not fall 1.0 feet or more below ground surface, as measured at a key gage, for one or more days during a period in which the water level has remained below ground for at least 30 days, at specific return frequencies shown above.

 

(2) = MFL Criteria for Marl-forming wetlands: Water levels within marl-forming wetlands that are located east and west of Shark River Slough, the Rocky Glades, and Taylor Slough within the Everglades National Park, shall not fall 1.5 ft. below ground surface, as measured at a key gage, for one or more days during a period in which the water level has remained below ground for at least 90 days, at specific return frequencies for different areas, as shown above.

 

(3) = Return frequencies  were developed using version 3.7 of the South Florida Water Management Model (SFWMM) and are the same as those stated on page 168, Table 44 of the adopted LEC Regional Water Supply Plan ( May 2000).

 

(4) = MFL depth, duration and return frequencies are based on historic rainfall conditions for the  31 year period of record from 1965 to 1995.


40E-8.231      Minimum Levels: Aquifers.

 

Biscayne Aquifer - The minimum level for the Biscayne aquifer is the level that results in movement of the saltwater interface landward to the extent that ground water quality at an established withdrawal point is insufficient to serve as a water supply source.   A MFL violation occurs when water levels within the aquifer produce this degree of saltwater movement at any point in time.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 F.S.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421, F.S.

History - New 9-10-01.

PART III:   MFL CRITERIA FOR LOWER WEST COAST REGIONAL PLANNING AREA

40E-8.301 Minimum Flows and Levels:  Surface Waters.

The MFLs contained in this Part identify the point at which further withdrawals would cause significant harm to the water resources, or ecology, of the area, as applicable, pursuant to Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S.   It is the District's intent to correct or prevent the violation of these criteria through management of the water resources.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.119, 373.129, 373.136, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421, 373.175, 373.216, 373.219, 373.223, 373.246 FS.

History - New 9-10-01.

40E-8.331 Minimum Levels: Aquifers.

The minimum levels for the lower Tamiami aquifer, the Sandstone aquifer and the mid-Hawthorn aquifer shall equal the structural top of the aquifer.  A violation of this criteria occurs when the water levels drop below the top of the uppermost geologic strata that comprises the aquifer, at any point in time.     Water level measurements that are made to monitor the conditions of the aquifers for the purpose of this rule, shall be located no closer than 50 feet from any existing pumping well.

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented 373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421 FS.

History - New 9-10-01.

PART IV:   IMPLEMENTATION

40E-8.421      Prevention and Recovery Strategies.

(1)       At the time of adoption of this rule, the existing flow or level for certain specified water bodies is below, or within 20 years is projected to fall below, the applicable MFL. For this reason, Section 373.0361, F.S., requires regional water supply plans to contain recovery and prevention strategies, including water resource development and water supply development projects that are needed to achieve compliance with MFLs during the planning period. The implementation of such projects will allow for the orderly replacement  or enhancement of existing water sources with alternative supplies in order to provide sufficient water for all existing and projected reasonable-beneficial uses, consistent with Section 373.0421, F.S.   

(a)       MFLs and recovery and prevention strategies will be implemented in phases with consideration of the District's missions in managing water resources, including water supply, flood protection, environmental enhancement and water quality protection, as required by Section 373.016, F.S. 

(b)       MFLs are implemented to prevent significant harm to the water resources and, where applicable, the ecology of the area due to further withdrawals (Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S.). A consumptive use permitting program is implemented to prevent harm to the water resource (Section 373.219, F.S.).   A water shortage program is implemented to prevent serious harm to the water resource (Sections 373.175 and 373.246, F.S.). Additionally, the protection of water resources will, in part, be achieved through the reservation of water for fish and wildlife or public health and safety (Section 373.223(4), F.S.).  The conceptual model identifying the relationships between these water resource protection requirements is set forth in Figure I in this Part. 

(c)        The rules implementing water resource protection tools, including Chapters 40E-2, 40E-8, 40E-20, 40E-21, and 40E-22, F.A.C., identify the specific factors and conditions that will be applied and considered in implementing the conceptual model.  Due to the extreme variations in water resource conditions, climatic conditions, hydrologic conditions, and economic considerations that will be faced when implementing these rules, it is critical to apply such criteria flexibly and to reserve for the governing board the ability to implement water resource protection and allocation programs considering all of the District's missions under Chapter 373, F.S., and to balance water supply, flood protection, resource protection and water quality protection needs.   Implementation of the recovery and prevention strategies will be achieved in compliance with the assurances to consumptive users and to natural systems contained in the LEC Plan and the LWC Plan.

(d)       The phasing and timetables for implementation of structural components in recovery and prevention strategies contained in approved regional water supply plans are found to meet the requirements in Section 373.0421(2), F.S., for the expeditious and practicable recovery of the MFLs.

(e)       Upon completion of each project or project phase of a recovery or prevention plan the District will certify the availability of water, as defined in Subsection Rule 40E-8.021(5), F.A.C.

(f)         In order to ensure that the actual and projected performance of  prevention and recovery strategies approved in the regional waters supply plans is sufficient to meet water resource needs, including MFLs, and the existing and projected reasonable-beneficial uses,  the District will update recovery and prevention strategies on a periodic basis, based on new information and system performance.  The performance of the recovery and prevention strategies in comparison to the performance projected in the regional water supply plans, will be assessed by the District for each recovery or prevention strategy phase.  Based on the actual performance and new information obtained regarding the water resources, the District will review and revise, if necessary, recovery and prevention strategies through the regional water supply plan update process every five years, or sooner, as required by Section 373.0361, F.S.  At that time, the governing board will determine if rule modifications to the MFL or recovery and prevention strategies are necessary to continue to meet the requirements of Sections 373.042 and 373.0421, F.S.


Figure 1: Conceptual Relationship Among the Harm, Serious Harm and Significant Harm Standards

 


(2)       The Everglades and the Caloosahatchee River  

(a)       As the effective date of this rule,  the Everglades and Caloosahatchee River have experienced MFL violations.    As a result, the LEC Plan and the LWC Plan contain approved recovery strategies, pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S.  Included in these recovery and prevention strategies is the CERP. 

b)         MFLs for many areas within the Everglades and the Caloosahatchee River, served by the C&SF Project, will not be achieved immediately upon adoption of this rule largely because of the lack of adequate regional storage or ineffective water drainage and distribution infrastructure.  Although not all locations within the Everglades are currently in violation of the proposed MFL, the Everglades, as a whole, is subject to a recovery strategy.  The LEC Plan identifies the structural and non-structural remedies necessary for the recovery of MFL water bodies.  These structural and non-structural remedies are also intended to restore the Everglades and the Caloosahatchee River above the MFLs, through Chapter 373, F.S. authorities of the District.  The projected long-term restoration of flows and levels in the Everglades resulting from implementation of the LEC Plan and the CERP is documented in the LEC Plan, and are intended to more closely approximate "pre-drainage" conditions. The planned components include implementing consumptive use and water shortage programs, removing  conveyance limitations, implementing revised C&SF Project operational programs, storing additional freshwater, reserving water  for the protection of fish and wildlife, and developing alternative sources for water supply.  These components will be implemented over the next 20 years, resulting in a phased restoration of the affected areas. 

(c)        The District, as the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' local sponsor of the C &SF Project, is charged with  implementing the CERP, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act  of 2000 (WRDA), Title VI entitled "Comprehensive Everglades Restoration," and in accordance with State law.  Assurances regarding water availability for consumptive uses and protection of natural systems are set forth in WRDA, Chapter 373, F.S., CERP and the LEC Plan, which will be followed by the District in implementing this Chapter.  Additional quantities of water for both consumptive uses and the natural systems made available from the CERP and other water resource development projects will be documented and protected on a project basis.  For project components implemented under CERP, the additional quantity, distribution and timing of delivery of water that is made available for the natural system for consumptive use, will be identified consistent with purposes of the CERP.    Under State law, water reservations and water allocations to consumptive uses will be utilized to protect water availability for the intended purposes.

(3)       Lake Okeechobee.  The LEC Plan contains an approved prevention strategy for Lake Okeeechobee pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S.  The prevention strategy consists of implementing  the District's water shortage plan, including supply side management, as simulated in the LEC Plan, and constructing and operating water supply and resource development projects.

(4)       Biscayne Aquifer.  The LEC Plan contains an approved prevention strategy for the Biscayne Aquifer pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S., which consists of the following:

(a)       Maintain coastal canal stages at the minimum operation levels shown in Table J-2 of the LEC Plan;

(b)       Apply conditions for permit issuance in Chapter 40E-2 or 40E-20, F.A.C., to prevent the harmful movement of saltwater intrusion up to a 1-in-10 year level of certainty;

(c)        Maintain a ground water monitoring network and utilize data to initiate water shortage actions pursuant to Rule 40E-8.441, F.A.C. and Chapters 40E-21 and 40E-22, F.A.C.;

(d)       Construct and operate water resource and water supply development projects; and

(e)       Conduct research in high risk areas to identify where the portions of the saltwater front is adjacent to existing and future potable water sources.

(5)       Lower West Coast Aquifers.   The LWC Plan identifies a prevention strategy for the LWC Aquifers, pursuant to Section 373.0421, F.S., as follows:

(a)       Establish "no harm" maximum permittable levels for each aquifer (regulatory levels) for a 1-in-10 year level of certainty;

(b)       Implement rule criteria to prevent harm through the consumptive use permitting process, including conditions for permit issuance in Rule 40E-2.301, F.A.C.;

(c)        Construct and operate water resource and supply development projects; and,

(d)       Implement the water shortage plan in Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C., as needed to prevent serious harm during drought conditions in excess of a 1-in-10 year level of certainty. 

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented  373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421  FS.

History - New 9-10-01.

40E-8.431      Consumptive Use Permits.

(1)       Consumptive use permit applications that propose to withdraw water directly or indirectly from a MFL water body, that meet the conditions for permit issuance in Part II of Chapter 373, F.S., (including implementing rules in this chapter, Chapter 40E-2, the Water Use Basis of Review, and 40E-20, F.A.C. as applicable), and are consistent with the approved recovery and prevention strategies under Section 373.0421, F.S., will be permitted.   Consumptive use permit applications will be reviewed based on the recovery and prevention strategy approved at the time of permit application review.

(2)       An existing permit will not be subject to revocation or modification by the District, prior to permit expiration, based on its impact on a MFL water body, unless the District has determined in the regional water supply plan that the reasonable-beneficial use served by the existing permitted allocation can otherwise be met from new or alternative water sources available (in place and operational) concurrent with such revocation or modification.

(3)       A permittee must comply with the requirements of Rule 40E-2.351, F.A.C., in order to obtain a permit transfer to a new permittee. 

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113, 373.171 FS.

Law Implemented  373.016, 373.036, 373.0361, 373.042, 373.0421 FS.

History - New 9-10-01.

40E-8.441      Water Shortage Plan Implementation.

(1)       Water shortage restrictions will be imposed as required by  District rules, on the direct or indirect withdrawals from a MFL water body if a MFL exceedance occurs or is projected to occur during climatic conditions more severe than a 1 in 10 year drought, to the extent consumptive uses contribute to such exceedance.  Under these circumstances, the District will equitably distribute available supplies to prevent serious harm to the water resources, pursuant to Sections 373.175 and 373.246, F.S., and the District's Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C.  The Water Shortage Plan utilizes a phased cutback approach with the severity of use restrictions increasing commensurate with increased potential for serious harm to the water resources.

(2)       Water shortage restrictions will not be used in place of a component in an approved recovery plan to provide hydrologic benefits that are ultimately to be provided by such recovery strategy.

(3)       MFL criteria will not be utilized to trigger water shortage restrictions during climatic conditions less severe than a 1 in 10 year level of drought.  

(4)       Water shortage restrictions will be implemented considering the factors in Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C., and this rule.  In declaring a water shortage to protect a MFL water body, the governing board shall give consideration to:

(a)       The level of drought;

(b)       Whether the MFL criteria will be or is being exceeded due to direct or indirect withdrawals;

(c)        The magnitude of the impact on the MFL water body, including water resource functions addressed by the MFL, from such withdrawals;

(d)       The magnitude of the regional hydrologic improvements projected to be derived from the proposed cutbacks;

(e)       Water management actions significantly contributing to the MFL exeedance; and

(f)         The practicality of using other methods, such as deliveries of water from the regional system, to reduce MFL exceedances.

(5)       The establishment and implementation of MFLs shall not limit the District's ability to impose water shortage restrictions pursuant to Sections 373.175 and 373.246, F.S., and the District's Water Shortage Plan, Chapter 40E-21, F.A.C., when water levels in a MFL water body are above an established MFL, nor shall it limit the District's ability to allow for the discharge or withdrawal of water from a MFL water body, when water levels are below an established MFL.

(6)       Phase III water shortage restrictions may be imposed, consistent with the factors herein, when a MFL criteria exceedance or violation is imminent.   Phase III or greater water shortage restrictions shall be implemented allowing for a shared adversity between continuing consumptive use and water resource needs. 

Specific Authority 373.044, 373.113 FS.

Law Implemented 373.042, 373.0421, 373.175, 373.246 FS.

History - New 9-10-01.

 

FINAL MFL page 2